My 13 year old son spent $60 on a birthday gift that AI could have faked for free.
It shows that AI will NOT replace all human work even when it makes economic sense.
A group of guys in Africa, dancing by a river, holding a chalkboard. "Happy birthday Ted. Connor loves you."
(Watch it with sound on. If it doesn't make you smile I'll Venmo you $10)
They printed a photo of my face and held it up. Sixty bucks. Delivered in two days.
It's not AI....I checked.
This could have easily been generated by AI for a fraction of $60.
But my son wouldn't have bought it even if it was 10x less.
It wouldn't have been special at all.
What made it special was 9 dudes halfway around the world dancing to Gangham Style while wishing me a happy birthday.
That fact is the entire product.
AI can match the output and still deliver nothing, because it cannot manufacture the one thing that mattered.
We keep telling ourselves that if AI produces similar output, it always wins.
That is a trap.
Output equivalence is not always value equivalence.
True for a birthday video and just as true in some of our work.
The brief, the memo, the advice are often not the product.
The accountable human who put their name on it is.
Where that holds, no amount of cheap or free automation replaces the human part.
My son knew that without thinking about it.
Thanks Connor. Best gift I have gotten in years buddy.
First published on LinkedIn. Read the thread and replies.
Ted Theodoropoulos is CEO and co-founder of Infodash and hosts the Legal Innovation Spotlight podcast. He writes about legal AI strategy, law firm technology, and the economics of the law firm business model.